ABSTRACT
Objectives: Treatment of severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) had a mortality of up to 70% in Germany. Many patients with COVID-19 need VV-ECMO support longer than 28 days (long-term VV-ECMO). Evidence on mortality, complications during intensive care, functional status after discharge and mortality-predictors for patients supported with long-term VV-ECMO is lacking. Method(s): Retrospective study of 137 consecutive patients treated with VV-ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19 at University Hospital Regensburg from March 2020 to March 2022. Result(s): 38% (n=52;87% male) of patients needed longterm VV-ECMO support. In these, SOFA score (median [IQR]) at ECMO initiation was 9 [8-11], age 58.2 [50.6- 62.5] years, PaO2/FiO2-ratio 67 [52-88] mmHg, pCO262 [52-74] mmHg, Murray-Score 3.3 [3.0-3.6] and PEEP 15 [13 - 16] cmH2O. Duration of long-term support was 45 [35-65] days. 26 (50%) patients were discharged from the ICU. Only one patient died after hospital discharge. At VVECMO initiation, baseline characteristics did not differ between deceased and survivors. Complications were frequent (acute kidney injury: 31/52, renal replacement therapy: 14/52, pulmonary embolism: 21/52, intracranial hemorrhage 8/52, major bleeding 34/52 and secondary sclerosing cholangitis: 5/52) and more frequent in the deceased. Karnofsky index (normal 100) after rehabilitation was 70 [57.5-82.5]. Twelve of the 18 patients discharged from rehabilitation had a satisfactory quality of life according to their own subjective assessment. Four patients required nursing support. Mortality-predictors within the first 30 days on VV-ECMO only observed in those who deceased later, were: Bilirubin >5mg/dl for > 7 days, pulmonary compliance <10ml/mbar for >14 days, and repeated serum concentrations of interleukin 8 >150ng/L. Conclusion(s): Long-term extracorporeal lung support in patients with COVID-19 resulted in 50 % survival and subsequently lead to a satisfactory quality of life and functionality in the majority of patients. It should preferably be performed in experienced centers because of a high incidence of complications. Several findings during the early course were associated with late mortality but need validation in large prospective studies.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Assessment of the literature on the ProtekDuo cannula when used as venopulmonary (V-P) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in ARDS secondary to COVID-19. Method(s): Systematic literature search in EMBASE, Medline (Pubmed) and NHS library using appropriate keywords as well as PICOS and PRISMA approach. Result(s): We found 285 publications, of which 5 publications met the search criteria and were included in this review. A total of 194 patients with COVID-19 related ARDS had a ProtekDuo placed to establish venovenous (V-V) ECMO and right ventricular (RV) support. Patients treated with the ProtekDuo cannula had survival rates between between the studies of 59 and 89%, with a significant survival compared to an invasive ventilation group or when compared to dual site V-V ECMO or other double lumen ECMO cannulas. One of the studies focused on extubation and early discontinuation of ventilator support, which the authors achieved in 100% of ProtekDuo patients. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was significantly reduced in the ProtekDuo versus other groups. Conclusion(s): The ProtekDuo displayed lower mortality rates, AKI occurrence and CRRT need as compared to other respiratory support modalities and has shown to be a game changer for ECMO support in patients suffering from COVID-19 ARDS. Many authors suggested the ProtekDuo for first line use in these patients.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To describe institutional experience using Oxygenated Right Ventricular Assist Device (OxyRVAD) Hybrid ECLS for adolescents with respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Method(s): Between September and December 2021, 44 Covid-19+ patients were admitted to our regional Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), including 4 adolescents who required Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) due to refractory hypoxemia. Two patients were initially cannulated onto Veno-Venous (VV) ECLS and converted to Oxy-RVAD ECLS due to refractory hypoxemia;the others were cannulated directly onto Oxy-RVAD ECLS. Two patients had observed right ventricular (RV) dysfunction or failure on echocardiography. Cannulations were performed in the cardiac catheterization suite by an interventional cardiologist using percutaneous technique under fluoroscopy. Circuit construction was varied and included the use of a dedicated RVAD cannula or standard cannula used for VA/VV ECLS. All patients were connected to Cardiohelp systems with built in centrifugal pumps and oxygenators. Result(s): Two patients were initially placed on VV-ECLS and converted to Oxy-RVAD ECLS days into their course due to severe, refractory hypoxemia with one having improvement in hypoxemia after the conversion. Two patients received renal replacement therapy (RRT) without complications, the others did not have indications for renal support. Two patients underwent tracheostomy on ECMO though none were able to separate from mechanical ventilation. Three patients survived to discharge. No incidents of circuit air or clotting were noted. The patient with the longest ECLS run required one circuit change and was the only patient to develop a superinfection: a successfully-treated fungal infection. All patients were mobilized on ECLS to sitting in a chair;one was able to ambulate. Conclusion(s): Oxy-RVAD hybrid ECLS can be used to effectively support adolescents with severe respiratory disease from conditions associated with RV dysfunction. Pediatric providers can collaborate with adult critical care colleagues to use novel methods to support these patients. RRT can also be used with this circuit. While more experience and data on this modality is needed, Oxy-RVAD ECLS should be considered in patients with severe RV dysfunction and associated refractory hypoxemia. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Septic shock, defined as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, is a condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. One of the hallmarks of sepsis is the excessive release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators that cause septic shock and multi-organ failure (MOF). New adsorbents are now available as adjuvant therapy aimed at modulating the cytokine "storm" in sepsis. They are thought to be useful if adopted early (within 8-24 hours of the diagnosis of septic shock) in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapy. Here we report our experience with CytoSorb. Method(s): From January 2021 to May 2022, 46 patients with septic shock were treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) associated with hemoadsorption with CytoSorb. All cases presented organ failure including AKI. Surgical patients (n = 13) were treated with surgery, COVID patients (n = 15) and medical patients (n = 16) with medical therapy;all surgery cases were operated on before starting the haemadsorption and in some cases reoperation with the need to suspend the adsorption. The mean age was 69 +/- 17 years (SD). On admission the mean SAPSII score was 50 +/- 11 (SD). CRRT as hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was performed. All patients received at least one CytoSorb treatment and additional treatments (up to 21 filters in a Covid patient) according to our indication. The CytoSorb cartridge was installed in series to the high cut-off filter;blood flow rates were maintained between 120 and 150 mL/min while dialysis doses from 18 to 45 mL/kg/hour. CytoSorb was renewed every 24 hours. We evaluated the impact of CytoSorb on 30-day survival, haemodynamics and relevant outcomes. Result(s): The 30-day survival was 30%. During treatment with CytoSorb, patients had a hemodynamic stabilization with a significant improvement in MAP, a reduction in amines and a decrease in PCR and PCT (Figure 1). Mortality at 30 days among medical patients was almost comparable to that of COVID patients and higher than that of surgical patients (70%, 69% and 61%, respectively). It should be noted that almost half of the deceased patients arrived late in the hospital, thus leading to a late start of treatment. Conclusion(s): We confirm the efficacy and usefulness of the CytoSorb if adopted early in patients who do not respond to standard therapy. CytoSorb treatment was safe and well tolerated with no device-related adverse events during or after treatment sessions.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complication of SARS-CoV-2 disease, associated with worse clinical outcomes. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in combination with sequential extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) might support renal function, attenuate systemic inflammation, and prevent or mitigate multiple organ dysfunctions. Method(s): We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients admitted in ICU for ARDS and who developed moderate-to-severe AKI requiring RRT. Cytokine hemadsorption with Cytosorb was performed in association with CRRT. The main indication for this treatment was the worsening of hemodynamic and respiratory conditions and suspicion of cytokine storm. The protocol consisted in the use of 3-4 cartridges in total;among these, the first 2 were changed after 12 hours of treatment to maximize cytokine removal, while the others after 24 hours. We examined comorbidities, clinical and laboratory characteristics and the impact of treatment in terms of mortality rate and changes in data before and after treatment. Result(s): Nineteen patients (95%) had an AKI at any time during their ICU stay. Of these, 5 patients (25%) had AKI stage II and 14 patients (70%) had AKI stage III. All patients included in this subgroup were mechanical ventilated and required vasopressor's use. Mean prescribed CRRT dose was 31.2 +/- 11.7 ml/kg/h. The median time to strating RRT after ICU admission was 7 days (IQR 3.5-15 days) and the median duration was 7 days (IQR 2.5-12.5 days). Mean SOFA score at the time of RRT start was extremely high (14.5 +/- 2.8). Mortality rate was important (18 patients, 90%) in our cohort. Comparing clinical and laboratory data before and after treatment, a significant improvement of inflammatory markers was reported, with the reduction of C-reactive protein (CRP, 143 [62.1- 328.5] vs 83.5 [66.7-153.5] mg/L);however, no significant changes in IL-6, WBC and PCT values were observed. A slight increase of PaO2/FiO2 were described, although not statistically significant (PaO2/FiO2 ratio 144 [82.7-174.2] vs 183 [132-355.5] mmHg). Conclusion(s): Our experience supports the need of an adequate timing for the use of Cytosorb in critically ill patients with Covid-19. Although a discrete efficacy in improving inflammatory cascade, the late use of EBPT, when organ dysfunction was already ongoing, didn't impact survival.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the clinical benefits and potential risks of using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) as a treatment for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Method(s): Relevant studies were identified through searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from January 2020 to December 2022. We included observational studies on adult patients who received venovenous (VV) ECMO support for COVID-19-induced ARDS. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, 3-month mortality, and complications associated with VV ECMO. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 and the metafor and meta packages. Result(s): The final analysis included 39 studies comprising 10,702 patients. In-hospital mortality for adults receiving ECMO was 34.2% (95% CI: 28.5% - 40.3%;I2 = 93%), while the 3-month mortality rate was 50.2% (95% CI: 44.4% - 56.0%;I2 = 51%). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 33.7% of patients (95% CI, 23.9 - 45.1;I2 = 96%). The pooled estimates for other complications were as follows: overall thromboembolic events 40.9% (95% CI, 24.8 - 59.3;I2 = 97%), stroke 8.7% (95% CI, 5.7 - 13.2;I2 = 72%), deep vein thrombosis 15.4% (95% CI, 9.7 - 23.6;I2 = 80%), pulmonary embolism 15.6% (95% CI, 9.3 - 25.1;I2 = 92%), gastrointestinal haemorrhage 8.1% (95% CI, 5.5 - 11.8;I2 = 56%), and the need for any renal replacement therapy in 38.0% of patients (95% CI, 31.6 - 44.8;I2 = 84%). Bacterial pneumonia occurred in 46.4% of patients (95% CI, 32.5 - 61.0;I2 = 96%). Conclusion(s): Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) may be an effective treatment option for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. The use of VV ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital and 3-month mortality. However, bleeding is a common complication that should be closely monitored. Further research is needed to determine the optimal use of VV ECMO in this patient population and to identify factors that may predict a favourable response to treatment.
ABSTRACT
Background: Septic shock is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The reduction of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators by hemoadsorption represents a new tool in the treatment of sepsis. In the present case series, we evaluated the impact of CytoSorb on adult patients with septic shock. Method(s): Patients with septic shock, admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from March 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022 who received CytoSorb therapy within 72 hours of admission were enrolled in the study. The severity of clinical conditions at admission was assessed by the SAPS II and SOFA scores;The magnitude of the inflammatory response was estimated using the plasmatic levels of C reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The effect of CytoSorb therapy on the inflammatory state, was evaluated measuring the percentage reduction of IL-6 and CRP. Time elapsed from ICU admission and the start of CytoSorb therapy was also assessed. T-test was used to compare the means of the groups of Survivors and No survivors. Fisher's test was used to evaluated the difference in mortality between Covid and No covid patients. Result(s): Twelve patients were evaluated. Six patients tested positive for covid-19, while the other six did not. Table 1 shows the values of age, SAPSII, SOFA, IL-6, CRP, PCT and timing between the survivors and the no survivors. Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of SAPSII, SOFA, age, CRP. There was a significant difference in the timing of Cytosorb start and percentage of IL-6 removal: In surviving patients the timing of intervention was shorter (3,3+/-1,8 vs 23,5+/-18,9 hours) than in non- survivors. The IL-6 removal rate was significantly higher in the survivor group (70,8+/-15,87 vs 33,2+/-12,26). Conclusion(s): In survivors the timing of CytoSorb therapy was shorter and the IL-6 removal rate was higher than in non-survivors. This suggest that the early applying of CytoSorb adsorber in combination with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) techniques, could increase the survival rate of septic shock patients. Using CytoSorb was safe and well tolerated with no device-related adverse events during or after the treatment.
ABSTRACT
It is now well-recognised that antimicrobial resistance (AMR), or the ability of organisms to resist currently available antibiotics and other antimicrobial drugs, represents one of the greatest dangers to human health in the 21st Century. As of 2022, AMR is a top-10 global public health threat. Various national and transnational initiatives have been implemented to address accelerating AMR, and the pressure to find local and global solutions is increasing. Despite this urgency, surprisingly limited progress is being made in rolling back or even slowing resistance. A multitude of perspectives exist regarding why this is the case. Key concerns include an enduring dependency on market-driven drug development, the lacklustre governance and habitual over-prescribing of remaining antimicrobial resources, and rampant short-termism across societies. While rarely presented in such terms, these disparate issues all speak to the social production of vulnerability. Yet vulnerability is rarely discussed in the AMR literature, except in terms of 'disproportionate effects' of AMR. In this paper, we offer a reconceptualisation of vulnerability as manifest in the AMR scene, showing that vulnerability is both a predictable consequence of AMR and, critically, productive of AMR to begin with. We underline why comprehending vulnerability as embodied, assembled, multivalent and reproduced through surveillance matters for international efforts to combat resistance.Copyright © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To describe our experience in ECMO for acute myocarditis Methods: Descriptive, retrospective study (2018-2022) of a cohort of 8 patients < 16 years with acute myocarditis who were assisted on ECMO. Result(s): 8 patients were collected, (6 females), with a mean age 7;8 years [range 0;1-13;8]. In 7/8, the reason for cannulation was hemodynamic instability refractory to medical treatment, with a mean inotropic score of 70 [range 10-122]. Sixty-two percent presented cardiorespiratory arrest prior to cannulation and 2 of them needed ECRP. The mean precannulation troponin level was 1498 ng/ml [range 89-6212]. Primary transport was performed in 4 patients. ECMO was peripheral veno-arterial in 100%, jugulo-carotid in 2/8 and femoro-femoral in 6/8. All patients underwent atrioseptostomy. They received treatment with levosimendan, immunoglobulins, corticoids and carnitine. In 4 acute infectious etiology was confirmed (parvovirus, influenza and SARSCoV2), another one was due to PIMS-TS and in 3 no etiology was found. Six patients underwent myocardial biopsy and 5 of them showed inflammatory infiltrates. The mean time on ECMO was 8 days [range 3-14], 2 of them requiring 2 ECMO courses. The mean length of PICU stay was 21 days [range 10-50]. Two were transferred to a heart transplant center. The main complications were arterial hypertension (88%), bleeding (63%), neurological (50%), arrhythmias (38%), coagulopathy (38%) and infectious (38%). One patient required renal replacement therapy. 1 patient died, 2 had moderate neurological sequels. Conclusion(s): ECMO is a therapeutic option in patients with fulminant myocarditis refractory to medical treatment and may help improve their prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To present a series of immunosuppressed patients (oncohematological disease, congenital immunosuppression, hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT), and solid organ transplant) assisted on ECMO. Method(s): Descriptive, retrospective study (2011-2020) of a cohort of 9 immunosuppressed patients, supported on ECMO. Medical records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were collected. Result(s): In our series of 9 patients, 5 were male, the median age was 8 years [RIC 3-11 years]. Considering the underlying disease, 6 were oncologic, 1 liver transplant and 2 with congenital immunodeficiency after HSCT. 4 were under active chemotherapy (median 6 days after the last cycle [RIC 5-188]). 6 were admitted due to acute respiratory failure, 3 due to hemodynamic instability (3/9), (one septic shock). The median PEEP was 12 [RIC 9-15] and FiO2 100% (81-100%). 78% (6) required vasoactive drugs (median inotropic score 35 [RIC 0-75]. 40%. 5 had severe neutropenia and/or plateletopenia in the 24 hours prior to ECMO, and alterations in acid-base balance (median pH 7. 1 [RIC 6.9-7.15]. 5 were on multiorgan failure. TPrimary ECMO transport was performed in 4 patients (44%). Cannulation was peripheral in 80% (57% cervical, 43% femoral) and central in 20%;70% VA-ECMO. Median time of assistance was 15 days [RIC 3.5-31.5] in cardiac ECMO (4), and 29 days [RIC 13.5-42] and in pulmonary ECMO (n=5). The median total time of admission was 45 days [RIC 27-59]. 9 had an infection, 2 COVID after HSCT, and 8 bleeding complications, but only one required surgical revision. Renal replacement therapy was used in 5 (median 9 days [RIC 5-34.5]). Other therapies used were polymyxin hemadsorption(2), intratracheal surfactant(2), plasma exchange(1), infusion of mesenchymal cells(1) and specific memory T lymphocytes(2). 4 patients died, 5 survived decannulation, 2 died later, with an overall survival rate to hospital discharge of 33% (3/9). Conclusion(s): Despite having a worse prognosis, ECMO can increase survival in immunosuppressed patients, in situations that are challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach.
ABSTRACT
Background: We reviewed patients with COVID-19 ARDS managed with VV-ECMO support at our center from March 2020 until February 2022. Material(s) and Method(s): We extracted data from electronic health records (Metavision and DIPS). We registered premorbid health status, ventilator-settings before initiation of ECMO, the time-course, and hospital mortality. Result(s): Thirty patients were managed at our hospital, with a median age of 57.2 years (28-65) and median BMI 28 (22-40). No patient had any serious comorbidity. Twenty-two patients received non-invasive ventilation prior to intubation (1-10 days). The median time on ventilator were 8.0 days (1-19) prior to ECMO and median tidal volume was 5.8 mL/kg PBW (3.1-7.5). Hypoxemia (median PaO2-FiO2 ratio 8 kPa, range 6-12 kPa) and hypercapnia (median PaCO2 11.9 kPa, range 4.2-18.5) [SEP1] despite lung protective ventilation were the main indications for VV-ECMO. Two patients had severe respiratory acidosis without hypoxemia. 18 patients developed serious complications while managed with ECMO (acute renal failure, clinically significant bleeding, sepsis, right ventricular heart failure, dislocation of cannulae). Seven patients received renal replacement therapy. Sixteen patients (53%) died. Thirteen patients (43%) died on ECMO, three (10%) after weaning, Twelve (40%) were discharged from hospital, two are currently in ICU (7%). The median duration of ECMO and ventilator treatment, was 27 (6-50) and 37 (9-78) days, respectively. Conclusion(s): Management of patients with COVID-19 ARDS with VV-ECMO is very resource-intensive, and accompanied by serious complications and high mortality. In-hospital mortality in our cohort was 53%, which is comparable with reports from other centers. However, the duration of ECMO, and pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation, were longer than typically reported.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Children requiring venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for long durations may have increased risk of complications compared to venovenous (VV) ECMO. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of conversion from VA to VV ECMO. Method(s): This is a retrospective review of all children requiring VA ECMO who underwent conversion to VV ECMO at a single institution, from 2015- 2022. Indications for and methods of conversion were examined as well as adverse events including re-operation, ischemic complications, renal failure, and mortality. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Result(s): Of 422 pediatric patients on initial VA ECMO, only three children (0.7%) underwent conversion from VA to VV support, ages 10-19: for hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID19, for cardiac dysfunction following orthotopic heart transplant, and for sepsis with associated left ventricular dysfunction. The indications for conversion were bleeding from cannulation site (n=2, 66%) and an anticipated prolonged ECMO run (n=1, 33%). For all three patients, the method of conversion was cutdown with femoral arterial repair followed by placement of additional jugular venous cannulas (n=2, 66%) or insertion of a singular jugular bicaval venous cannula with removal of the femoral cannulas (n=1, 33%). The median time on VA ECMO prior to conversion was 8 days (range 4-54 days). All 3 patients were managed with renal replacement therapy with 1 patient (33%) progressing to long term dialysis. There were no significant ischemic limb complications although one (33%) patient developed a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm that required re-operation. Two of the three patients (66%) were able to be decannulated at a median of 23.5 days (range 8-39 days) following conversion to VV ECMO and survived to discharge. The other patient was unable to be decannulated after successful conversion and care was withdrawn. Conclusion(s): Based on this small pilot study, conversion to VV ECMO from initial femoral VA ECMO cannulation is safe and feasible. Indications for conversion include coagulopathy and need for extended ECMO run after recovery of cardiac function.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To describe institutional experience using Oxygenated Right Ventricular Assist Device Oxy-RVAD) Hybrid ECLS for adolescents with respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Method(s): Between September and December 2021, 44 Covid-19+ patients were admitted to our regional Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) including 4 adolescents who required Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) due to refractory hypoxemia. Two patients were initially cannulated onto Veno-Venous (VV) ECLS and converted to Oxy-RVAD ECLS due to refractory hypoxemia;the others were cannulated directly onto Oxy-RVAD ECLS. Two patients had observed right ventricular dysfunction (RV) or failure on echocardiography. Cannulations were performed in the cardiac catheterization suite by an interventional cardiologist using percutaneous technique under fluoroscopy. Circuit construction was varied and included the use of a dedicated RVAD cannula or standard cannula used for VA/VV ECLS. All patients were connected to CardiohelpTM systems with built-in centrifugal pumps and oxygenators. Result(s): Two patients were initially placed on VV-ECLS and converted to Oxy-RVAD ECLS days into their course due to severe, refractory hypoxemia with one having improvement in hypoxemia after the conversion. Two patients were cannulated directly to Oxy-RVAD ECLS support. Two patients received renal replacement therapy (RRT) without complications, the others did not have indications for renal support. Two patients underwent tracheostomy on ECMO though none were able to separate from mechanical ventilation. Three patients survived to discharge. No incidents of circuit air or clotting were noted. The patient with the longest ECLS run required one circuit change and was the only patient to develop a superinfection: a successfully-treated fungal infection. All patients were mobilized on ECLS to sitting in a chair;one was able to ambulate. Conclusion(s): Oxy-RVAD hybrid ECLS can be used to effectively support adolescents with severe respiratory disease from conditions associated with RV dysfunction. Pediatric providers can collaborate with adult-focused colleagues to use novel methods to support these patients. RRT can also be used with this circuit. While more experience and data on this modality is needed, Oxy-RVAD ECLS should be considered in patients with severe RV dysfunction and associated refractory hypoxemia.
ABSTRACT
This book provides healthcare professionals in Critical Care setting an easy consultation guide to fight against COVID-19. The book is divided into sections: Fundamentals of COVID-19, Pneumological critical care, Neurological manifestations, Cardiovascular manifestations, Renal manifestations, Haemostasis and coagulation, Other multi-organs involvement, Principles of therapy. Each section includes: · brief pathophysiology of COVID-19 (ventilation, neurological, cardiovascular, etc.);· principles of management (enriched with flowcharts and figures);· principles of therapy;· tips and key messages. Readers can find the most updated advices on how to face the ongoing pandemic: from principles of conventional oxygen therapy, assisted and invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill COVID-19 patients to the complications sometimes underestimated. Tables and flowcharts provided are based on current knowledge in COVID-19 to help the clinician managing COVID-19 patients by a multiple-organs prospective. Written by international key opinion leaders of each field, the book represents a point of reference for all professionals involved in the management of COVID-19 pandemic. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) is the virus causing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19). Apart from respiratory disease, this virus can affect different organs. Objectives: Therefore, multiple mechanisms have been hypothesized for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in COVID-19. In this study, we evaluate the incidence and prognosis of AKI in COVID-19 patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed 397 COVID-19 patients hospitalized between April 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. Patients with a sudden rise of serum creatinine level, more than 0.3 mg/dl in two days or more than 50% of the initial level in one week, were diagnosed with AKI. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical features were compared in AKI patients with patients without AKI. Results: A total of 397 patients with a mean age +/- standard deviation of 55.42 +/- 15.26 years were included in the study. According to diagnostic criteria, 48 (12.1%) patients developed AKI. Old age, a history of hypertension, and chronic renal failure were suggested as risk factors for AKI. High levels of C-Reactive Protein, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, Lactate Dehydrogenase, D-dimer, and serum phosphorus upon arrival were also associated with an increased risk of AKI. In addition, the incidence of hypernatremia and hyperkalemia increased mortality in patients with AKI. Conclusion: The incidence of AKI in admitted COVID-19 patients affects the duration of hospitalization, the chance of ICU admission, and mortality. It is important to limit the use of nephrotoxic drugs and to maintain water-electrolyte balance to prevent the incidence of AKI and improve the outcome.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Orogastric tube insertion is a routine procedure in medical care. However, misplacement of the tube can cause a variety of complications, which can be life threatening in some instances. Case Description/Methods: 71-year-old male presented with dyspnea, fever, chills, cough, and myalgia for 2 weeks. He had tachycardia, tachypnea, and was hypoxic to 66% in room air. He was found to have acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 Pneumonia and was admitted to ICU. But, he continued to be hypoxic and was started on BiPAP. He eventually became altered, and was intubated. Post intubation orogastric tube (OGT) placement was unsuccessful on the first attempt due to resistance. On the second attempt, the nurse was able to advance partially (Figure). But, a chest XR showed OGT in the mediastinum, and OGT was removed. CT of neck and chest revealed pneumomediastinum with possible mid-thoracic esophageal perforation. The patient was started on broad-spectrum antibiotics and thoracic surgery was consulted. Given his mechanical ventilation requirement, surgery deemed him unfit to tolerate thoracotomy and the endoscopic procedure was not available in the hospital. So, recommendation was to manage conservatively. His hospital course was complicated by hypotension requiring vasopressors and metabolic acidosis in setting of acute renal failure requiring CRRT. Code status was changed by the family to Do Not Resuscitate due to his deteriorating condition. Eventually, he had a PEA arrest and was expired. Discussion(s): OGT intubation is performed at hospitals for feeding, medication administration or gastric decompression. Although it is considered a safe procedure, complications can arise due to OGT misplacement or trauma caused by the OGT itself or the intubation process. OGT misplacement is typically endotracheal or intracranial. Misplacement within the upper GI lumen is usually detected by a kink in the oropharynx or esophagus. The subsequent complications are identified by the structure that is perforated (e.g., mediastinitis or pneumothorax). Regardless of whether counteraction is perceived, the physician must be careful not to apply excessive force. The location of the OGT tip should be determined by a chest radiograph;visualization of the tip below the diaphragm verifies appropriate placement. Complications of OGT insertion are uncommon;however, the consequences are potentially serious, and the anatomy of the upper GI tract should be understood by all who are involved in the care.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Intensive care outcomes in patients with cirrhosis are relatively poor. The comparison between outcomes, especially related to infections, remains unclear in those with and without cirrhosis. With the emergence of resistant and fungal organisms, the changes in infection profiles over time are important to analyze. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of cirrhosis and infections on inpatient death over time in a qSOFA-matched cohort of patients with and without cirrhosis. Method(s): Inpatients admitted to ICUs throughout 2015-2021 were analyzed. Patients with cirrhosis were matched 1:1 by age, gender, and admission qSOFA to patients without;COVID-positive patients were excluded. Admission demographics, labs, the reasons for ICU transfer, infections, and inpatient death or hospice referral were obtained for each patient. Comparisons were made between patients with and without cirrhosis and those who died/referred to hospice versus not. Logistic regression for death/hospice was performed. In patients with cirrhosis, the culture results were compared over the years. Result(s): 1669 patients;833 cirrhosis and 836 non-cirrhosis patients were included. Patients with cirrhosis had higher rates of infection, positive culture, abdominal infection, and bacteremia. They also had higher gram-positive and fungal infections with a higher rate of VRE. They showed a greater organ failure load, death, and hospice referral compared to patients without cirrhosis. Logistic regression showed that cirrhosis (OR 4.0, p< 0.0001), admission qSOFA (1.60, p< 0.0001), WBC (1.02, p=0.003), reasons for ICU (altered mental status 1.69, hypotension 1.79, renal support 2.77, respiratory failure 1.79, CVA 1.96, all p< 0.0001) with Infection (1.77, p< 0.0001, >1 microbe isolated 1.86, p=0.05) were risk factors for death/hospice. The infection trend in the cirrhosis group showed a significant decrease in positive cultures and gram-negative infections and an increase in fungal and gram-positive infections over time. Conclusion(s): Despite matching for demographics and qSOFA, patients with cirrhosis had higher risks of death and organ failures. They were more likely to develop gram-positive and fungal infections with multiple organisms and VRE. Time trends in cirrhosis showed lower rates of positive cultures and gram-negative infections and an increase in fungal and gram-positive infections over time, which should encourage re-evaluation of diagnostic and prophylactic strategies in cirrhosis-related infections. (Figure Presented).